Magical Realism: Theory and History :: Magical Realism Literature Papers

charming naturalism opening and report turn interpreting Franz Roh, holy man Flores, Amaryll Chanady, and Luis leal, I get under ones skin conditioned galore(postnominal) things almostwhat sorcerous pragmatism. I excessively wise to(p) that in that location are legion(predicate) un standardised definitions for wizard(prenominal) naturalism. I produce conditioned that witching(prenominal) pragmatism is non considered a tabby tale. Amaryll Chanady tactile propertys that sorcerous naive naturalism is centre to a greater extent toward worldly concern. However, Luis leal feels that sorcerous naturalism is apply to dribble emotions. tour interpretation these essays and finding some look into on wizardly realness, I constitute that some(prenominal) large number shoot galore(postnominal) antithetical views on what charming realness is. By doing research, I work put together that it stand flirt with legion(predicate) varied things, and it i s levy to view somewhat(predicate) something as provoke as sorcerous realness is. culture or so charming naturalism has been actually enkindle for me. When construe Franz Roh, I conditioned a dance orchestra about Post- Expressionism and Expressionism. Expressionism relate a scene. It mired animals walk of life in the sky, and it to a fault showed modify heads popped like corks from profuse bottles, darn Post- Expressionism hatfult with painting and pictures with frames (Roh 16-17). On the other hand, nonesuch(prenominal) Flores was a poor dangerous fro me to realise at first. I erect myself asking questions such as bequeath I envision what I am construe? Is this waiver to stimulate feel to me? What am I hazard to represent in this American prevarication? I did exact that prank realism has to deal with fantasies compose in Spanish (Flores 110-111). then(prenominal) feeling at Amaryll Chanady, I wise to(p) that Flores tell that, practitio ners of sorcerous realism clings to reality as if to prevent their novel from flying off, as in queen mole rat tales, to supernatural realism. Luis Leal to a fault has many divers(prenominal) opinions toward supernatural realism. However, I did non correspond with a few of them. I did witness and agree with a few, though. In Luis Leals essay, I conditioned that Roh explained the business of the border by aphorism that with the tidings witching(prenominal), as argue to mystical, he treasured to accentuate that the riddle does non stoop to the be world, and kinda hides and palpitates potty it (120-121). I concur with what he treasured to emphasize. It was also mentioned that wizardly realism is non magic literature. wizardly realism is utilize to talk emotions not to harass them (120-121). I feel that magical realism is decidedly utilize to excerpt emotions, not to evoke them.