Corporate Social Responsibility To Finance -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Corporate Social Responsibility To Finance? Answer: Introduction Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the effort taken by an organisation to improve the condition of society in their way. As stated by De Villiers and Alexander (2014), CSR efforts range from environment-friendly policies to donating money for the noble cause. CSR strategies are taken by an organisation as advertisement technique to improve the public image. CSR techniques also improve the media coverage and boost the employee management. The aim of the report is to explore CSR activities and governance structure of BHP Billiton including the theoretical framework of CSR and ethics. In the first section of the report, a short overview of BHP Billiton is given stating the CSR activities. The theoretical framework of CSR is explained and synthesis of theories with company performance is also given. This report states about CSR issues of BHP Billion and its possible resolution. Overview of BHP Billiton BHP Billiton is an Anglo-Australian multinational company and this organisation operates in metals, mining and petroleum. BHP Billiton has it headquarter in Melbourne and London. BHP and Billiton were both separate companies and they merged up in the year 2001. BHP Billiton is a dual-listed company (ASX: BHP and NYSE: BHP) and it serves worldwide basis. Key products of BHP Billiton are iron ore, copper, natural gas, coal, petroleum, nickel and uranium (Bhp.com 2018). In the year 2016, revenue of the BHP Billiton was AU$30 billion and numbers of employees of BHP Billiton are 65,000. Companys CSR activities and Governance structure BHP Billiton is one of the 85 companies in the world marketing and extracting fossil fuels. BHP Billiton is responsible for two-thirds of global greenhouse emissions (Cheng et al. 2014). BHP Billiton is in the mining sector and it is aware of the fact as its cumulative emissions touched 7,605 MtCO2e and it represents almost 0.52%. BHP Billiton is ranked world's 19th polluter corporation and BHP estimated that 10% pollution is done because of emission and 90% is from the products of BHP Billiton (Tai and Chuang 2016). BHP Billiton does not hire child labours before completing their compulsory education. BHP Billiton does not recruit the employees below 15 years of age and the suppliers of the employees need to ensure that the employees are not forced. BHP Billiton provides the benefits that are related to the standard working benchmark. Most importantly, BHP Billiton ensures that workplace health and safety must be ensured and the employees can protect themselves from workplace hazards. BHP Billiton ensures that materials should not be sources from listed World Heritage sites and this organisation does not deal with corruption, extortion and bribery. BHP Billiton works to ensure occupational exposure limits that can protect the people and potential occupational exposures have reduced by 76% compared to 2012 (Saeidi et al. 2015). In addition, Bio-fuels are sourced from a globally renowned company that must have standards (Csrhub.com 2018). BHP Billiton is committed to contributing towards society through advocacy and engagement on important issues to support the target development areas. BHP Billiton works for community development and it produces education scholarship for young women. BHP Billiton provides renewable energy powering to the closed mine sites. In FY 2017, social investment and contribution of BHP Billiton were US$80.1 million and 1% of the tax profit was invested to provide benefit to the community (Bhp.com 2018). CSR rating of the company is 59 and it is comparable to the community, environment, employees and governance (Csrhub.com 2018). BHP Billiton is committed to providing the highest level of governance and it is striving to foster for the best culture, rewards and values in exemplary ethical standards, corporate integrity and personal and respect to the others. Board Membership and Process is comprised of CEO, and there is a guidance of the management between Board and the CEO. Shareholders appoint the CEO and Board will always have the majority of Directors (Bhp.com 2018). High standard governance is critical to provide strategy, maintain social license and create long-term value. The Board looks into the matter of Board's Sustainability Committee that assists the governance to monitor sustainability. Theoretical understanding of CSR Carrolls Pyramid Carolls Pyramid is based on CSR and its framework helps to understand the organisations how and why they need to meet the social responsibilities. CSR Pyramid is built on the concept of profit and then, it comes to the regulations and laws. There are four major sections in this pyramid. Economic responsibilities an organisation is about making the organisations profitable and it is the only way to survive and give an advantage to society in long-term basis. Legal responsibilities of an organisation are associated to obey laws and other legislation in order to exist within a market. In addition, as stated by Carroll (2015), the organisations must comply with the employment, health and safety and competition laws those are within the industry. Ethical responsibilities are associated with acting ethically and morally for the betterment of society and for the employees. This responsibility of the business goes with narrow needs of the laws, for instance, treatment of the employees and suppliers. Philanthropic responsibilities of the organisations are related to the giving back to the environment and society to provide benefits. This type of responsibility is discretionary; however, it is important for the organisations. Philanthropic responsibilities are associated with the staffs' time on the project and charitable donation (Luo et al. 2015). Carrolls CSR Pyramid has its strengths as it shows that CSR has more than one element and it puts strength on profit. Wartick and Cochranes Typology Corporate Social Responsibility is a determinant fact of corporate social performance as this typology deals with between disclosure and performance. The firms have responsibilities beyond the economic gain and these factors are considered as social responsibilities of the organisation. It is important to discuss firm's social responsiveness towards the society. As stated by Wartick and Mahon (1994), corporate social performance reflect s mainly interaction among the elements of social responsibilities and it is the process of social responsiveness, there are policies that help to develop to address the social issues. Another author Wood acknowledged the conceptual thinking process of business and society. Performance of the firms talks about actions and outcomes, not just the integration process. Social responsiveness is a set of process and it is not a single process. The social responsive process is restrictive in nature and organisational policies can address social issues. Forma l policies cannot reflect the behaviours of the employees and employers as they are unwritten in nature. As stated by Pundrich (2017), the social performance of the business concept has been done based on binary connotation and social performance is what is needed for social responsibility of the business. Social performance of the business needs to be evaluated on both positive and negative basis to process the social responsibility, social responsiveness and programmes and policies. Synthesis of theories with companys CSR activities BHP Billiton responsibly manages and enables the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions to provide a sustainable society. In Australia, it extracts minerals from the areas of Olympic Dam, Western Australia Iron Ore, New South Wales, New South Wales Energy Coal, BHP Billiton Mitsui Coal and Nickel West. BHP Billiton provides sustainability as they put emphasis on health and safety and environment sustainability (Cooper 2017). The stakeholders of the organisation BHP are business partners, community-based organisations, labour unions, government and regulators, industry peers and association, media, non-government organisations and social partners. Globally, BHP Billiton communicates through corporate publications, general meetings and sustainability reports. BHP Billiton provides emphasis on human rights and it supports the communities. BHP Billiton makes a partnership with the host community and it shares the stewardship with the environment and it supports the local culture to drive the economic development. The organisation has a social licence in order to operate in the correct way. BHP Billiton is committed to following the laws and jurisdictions in order to meet the regulatory requirements. BHP Billiton has its charter and it follows the rules and regulations as mentioned in requirements standards. The Code of Practice of the organisation clearly mentions that minimum performance is required to implement and develop the management system of the assets. Contractors and employees of the organisations have to follow the health and safety environment and community (HDEC) requirements and standards and the organisation engage the suppliers to maintain the workplace health and safety (Gilavas and Mish 2015). BHP Billiton works in many mining fields, these places are polluted and the people are facing the environmental issues for this. In such places, BHP Billiton holds interests in firms and joint ventures. It starts joint venturing to operate companies around the sustainable development to make the formal governance structure for technical exchanges (Yakovleva 2017 ). BHP Billiton works in the mining sector and it deals with the non-renewable resources. It emits greenhouse gas and therefore, it is solely responsible for making the environment polluted. BHP Billiton is consistent with positioning statement and it follows mandatory requirements from the UN's Global Compact and UN's declaration of human rights. In order to manage the risks, the management monitors the functions and assets to identify the managerial risks and this process applies to follow Risk-based approach towards the sustainability (Ahi and Searcy 2015). BHP Billiton has been following the Sustainable Development Goals for the well being of the organisation in future as it has direct business activities to follow social responsibilities. BHP Billiton follows the royalties and taxes of the host government and it is creating a new opportunity for employment. BHP Billiton has been facing the corporate social issues as it needs to have a mechanism for compensation associated with mining. BHP Billiton cannot improve the community live and these costs are associated with housing cost, food and environmental impact. BHP Billiton does not build up good relations with local communities and not having relation with the community makes the project delays for BHP Billiton and it can even lead to mine closure. As stated by Yakovleva (2017), the mining industry is technically complex industry and BHP Billiton uses a few techniques to provide benefits to the local community. BHP creates long-term values for shareholders and it is creating growth strategy to invest in long and large-scale projects. BHP Billiton is no corporate climatic sceptic and the organisation has accepted the mainstream concept of climatic change since 1996. In the year 2010, this company embarked publicly to call for carbon pricing in Australia. Now, Australia's political concept has altered dramatically and new government claims for electoral anti-climate agenda. In the year 2013, BHP Billiton faced issue regarding the carbon pricing in Australia. BHP Billion has been reporting on GHG emissions since the year 1996. Possible resolutions In the year 2015, BHP Billiton experienced dam failure and it is a joint venture of Samarco. 19 people died after this incident and it is the duty of BHP Billiton to help the communities (Bhp.com 2018). BHP Billiton should take socio-economic programmes to help the people by providing financial assistance to improve the communities those are surrounded by BHP Billitons mining fields. Community improvement can be guaranteed through giving livelihood, resettlement, education, culture, health and livelihood. This policy will help to provide well-being of human capital, people of labour, corporate and other stakeholders interests. BHP Billiton should operate their business practice with integrity and ethics. This practice will bring values to the employees life and it will deliver commitments to the stakeholders, host communities and employees. BHP Billiton needs to create anti-creation compliance and it should run with process, compliance and system. BHP Billiton should be an environment-friendly organisation through focusing on the pillar planet'. They use products that can reduce the reliance on natural resources. They can use recycled materials and look at the activities to do the business process in a different way. It will help to reduce ecological footprint and it also helps to carefully manage the consumption of energy. Conclusions It has been observed that BHP Billiton has been focusing to reduce the carbon-dioxide emission and it has been taking other measures to improve the society and environment. Climate change is another factor for the organisation and it is practising to support the innovative investment in low-carbon development. Stakeholders' engagement will be helpful for BHP Billiton to provide effective and long-term policy framework. The organisation has been facing the issues of greenhouse gas emission and it is actively participating in delivering the measure to lower the footprint. Reference List Ahi, P. and Searcy, C., 2015. Assessing sustainability in the supply chain: A triple bottom line approach.Applied Mathematical Modelling,39(10-11), pp.2882-2896. BHP. 2018.BHP Billiton | A leading global resources company. Available at: https://www.bhp.com/ [Accessed 2 Feb. 2018]. Bhp.com. 2018. Sustainable Report. Available at: https://www.bhp.com/-/media/documents/investors/annual-reports/2017/bhpsustainabilityreport2017.pdf [Accessed 2 Feb. 2018]. Carroll, A.B., 2015. Corporate social responsibility: The centrepiece of competing and complementary frameworks. Organizational Dynamics,44(2), pp.87-96. Cheng, B., Ioannou, I. and Serafeim, G., 2016. Corporate social responsibility and access to finance.Strategic Management Journal,35(1), pp.1-23. Cooper, S., 2017.Corporate social performance: A stakeholder approach. London: Taylor Francis. Csrhub.com. 2018.Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Reports | CSR Ratings. Available at: https://www.csrhub.com [Accessed 2 Feb. 2018]. De Villiers, C. and Alexander, D., 2014. The institutionalisation of corporate social responsibility reporting.The British Accounting Review,46(2), pp.198-212. Glavas, A. and Mish, J., 2015. Resources and capabilities of triple bottom line firms: Going over old or breaking new ground?.Journal of Business Ethics,127(3), pp.623-642. Govindan, K., Kannan, D. and Shankar, K.M., 2014. Evaluating the drivers of corporate social responsibility in the mining industry with the multi-criteria approach: A multi-stakeholder perspective. Journal of cleaner production,84, pp.214-232. Luo, X., Wang, H., Raithel, S. and Zheng, Q., 2015. Corporate social performance, analyst stock recommendations, and firm future returns.Strategic Management Journal,36(1), pp.123-136. Pndrich, A.P., 2017. Oil companies, social responsibility and CSP: combining actions and profiles.Management Decision,55(10), pp.2111-2125. Saeidi, S.P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S.P. and Saaeidi, S.A., 2015. How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction.Journal of Business Research,68(2), pp.341-350. Sarkis, J. and Dhavale, D.G., 2015. Supplier selection for sustainable operations: A triple-bottom-line approach using a Bayesian framework.International Journal of Production Economics,166, pp.177-191. Tai, F.M. and Chuang, S.H., 2014. Corporate social responsibility. Business,6(03), p.117. Wartick, S.L. and Mahon, J.F., 1994. Toward a substantive definition of the corporate issue construct A review and synthesis of the literature. Business Society,33(3), pp.293-311. Yakovleva, N., 2017.Corporate social responsibility in the mining industries. London: Routledge.